Skip to main content

Single-endpoint report

Firely public test server (R5): endpoint report

Everything this project observed about this one endpoint, everything it did not observe, and what would change the result. Free to read, link, print and hand on; there is nothing here behind a sign-in and nothing to buy.

Built to print. Use your browser’s print or “Save as PDF” to keep a dated copy; the page carries its own address and observation date.

Grade on this run

Grade
C
Category
Reference and test servers
Base URL observed
https://server.fire.ly/r5
Reach on this run
Reached from 3 of 3 reporting vantages, sitting on 1 network. Vantages on one network are one network's view sampled several times.
Last answered
2026-10-03 (answered on this run)
Availability
answered 57 of the last 58 daily checks (98%)
Observed
2026-10-03 15:21 UTC

What was observed, and what was not

This report covers 9 checks. 9 ran. 0 were asked from every reporting vantage and answered by none. 0 were never asked, because nothing was retrieved for them to read. The three are different facts and none of them is a zero: a check that did not run publishes no number, no mark against this endpoint, and nothing below to act on.

Reachability

Reachability: 100 out of 100
CheckStateWhat this run observed
R1 Pass/metadata answers with HTTP 2xx over HTTPS: reachable from all 3 vantages, which are 3 hosts on one network (github-actions): one network's view sampled 3 times, not 3 independent networks
R2 Pass/metadata responded in 2599 ms (median across 3 reachable vantages on one network)

Capability transparency

Capability transparency: 100 out of 100
CheckStateWhat this run observed
T1 PassfhirVersion declared: '5.0.0' (expected 5.x)
T2 Passsoftware name and version declared
T3 Pass158 resource types declared
T4 Pass158/158 declared resources document their interactions

Interop readiness

Interop readiness: 0 out of 100
CheckStateWhat this run observed
I1 Needs attention377 profile canonical(s) declared in rest.resource.profile, rest.resource.supportedProfile, none of them US Core, CARIN, or Da Vinci; also checked instantiates, imports, meta.profile
I2 Needs attentionSMART .well-known/smart-configuration absent or incomplete
I3 Needs attentionno OAuth security service declared

What each vantage saw

reached from 3 of 3 reporting vantages, on 1 network
VantageResultWhat it sawCondition
github-actions/macos-latestreachedanswered in 8274 msHTTP 200
github-actions/ubuntu-latestreachedanswered in 2599 msHTTP 200
github-actions/windows-latestreachedanswered in 1218 msHTTP 200

Vantages on one network are one network’s view sampled several times. A rule applied to that network’s address space reaches every one of them at once and reads exactly like agreement.

What would change this

Ordered by the points each would recover. Every item below comes from a check that actually ran on this run; nothing derived from a check that did not run appears here. The three dimensions are weighted, so recovering points does not guarantee a different letter — how we grade gives the weights.

  1. Declare the implementation guide's canonical URLs. Any of five conformance elements is read: rest.resource.supportedProfile, rest.resource.profile, instantiates, imports, or meta.profile. The finding above names where this project looked and what it found there.

    Worth up to 40 of the 100 points in Interop readiness.

    This run observed: 377 profile canonical(s) declared in rest.resource.profile, rest.resource.supportedProfile, none of them US Core, CARIN, or Da Vinci; also checked instantiates, imports, meta.profile

  2. Publish .well-known/smart-configuration at the base URL, carrying at least authorization_endpoint and token_endpoint.

    Worth up to 35 of the 100 points in Interop readiness.

    This run observed: SMART .well-known/smart-configuration absent or incomplete

  3. Declare the authorization surface in the CapabilityStatement itself, at rest[].security.service, as well as in SMART discovery.

    Worth up to 25 of the 100 points in Interop readiness.

    This run observed: no OAuth security service declared

If this does not match what you see

Every number here describes two public documents at one moment, read from the vantages listed above. If it does not match what you serve, the difference is worth knowing.

Correct or dispute this record. There is no sign-in, no fee, and nothing to buy: this report is free to read, link, print and hand on, and this project collects nothing about the people who read it.

Where this came from

live CapabilityStatement fetch; software 'Firely Server' (recorded 2026-08-05). Re-checked 2026-08-19: live CapabilityStatement re-fetch from the davis-ca residential vantage; fhirVersion 5.0.0, 158 resource types, publisher 'Firely', software 'Firely Server 6.9.1+e4f2e63c5e20f326898f61339c3b3fcd48017201'.

The same run, as data: this endpoint's JSON, what its CapabilityStatement declares, resource by resource, and every observation on record for it, with the dates it answered and the dates it did not.

This is an observational snapshot of a public, unauthenticated surface. It is not an audit, a ranking of care quality, or a statement about anyone's regulatory compliance. Grades are comparable within a category only. See how we grade.